Starts Tomorrow Book Now!
The Level 123 Coach Training Cohort 1 for IE Group is a 60 hour Coach Training course to help coaches certify with Comensa at Level 1, and is designed as one programme that aligns with:
COMENSA
International Coaching Federation
EMCC Global
…requires vertical integration:
Level 1 = Foundation / Practitioner
Level 2 = Advanced / Professional
Level 3 = Mastery / Reflective / Research-Informed Practice
Below is a 20-week, 40-session structure (2 x 90-minute sessions per week starting 1 April 2026).
This assumes:
60 contact hours (40 × 1.5 hours)
Including required: mentoring, coaching practice hours, supervision, portfolio, assessment outside class time
It is a Spiral curriculum (same competencies deepened over time)
20-Week Integrated Coach Training Programme
Start: 1 April
Duration: 20 Weeks
Sessions: 2 per week (90 minutes each)
Total Contact Hours: 60 Hours
PHASE 1 (Weeks 1–5)
Foundations – Ethics, Presence, Core Skills
(ICF Level 1 / EMCC Foundation / COMENSA Practitioner / QCTO Knowledge Modules)
Week 1
Session 1:
Programme orientation
Overview of QCTO, COMENSA, ICF, EMCC pathways
Coaching vs mentoring vs therapy vs consulting
Contracting expectations
Session 2:
Global Codes of Ethics comparison
Ethical decision-making models
Case study discussions
Week 2
Session 3:
ICF Core Competencies deep dive
EMCC Competence Framework overview
Session 4:
Coaching mindset
Self-awareness and bias
Reflective journaling practice
Week 3
Session 5:
Establishing agreements
Goal setting frameworks (SMART, CLEAR, GROW)
Session 6:
Psychological safety
Trust building
Boundaries
Week 4
Session 7:
Active listening (Level 1–3 listening)
Somatic listening
Session 8:
Powerful questioning
Avoiding leading questions
Live triad practice
Week 5
Session 9:
Direct communication
Reframing and metaphor
Session 10:
Coaching presence
Managing silence
Live assessment practice 1
PHASE 2 (Weeks 6–10)
Applied Coaching – Process & Models
(ICF Level 2 / EMCC Practitioner / COMENSA Practitioner Level 2 / QCTO Practical Modules)
Week 6
Session 11:
Coaching structures beyond GROW
Developmental coaching
Session 12:
Action design
Accountability systems
Week 7
Session 13:
Emotional intelligence in coaching
Working with emotion
Session 14:
Neuroscience basics for coaches
Brain-based coaching
Week 8
Session 15:
Values elicitation
Identity work
Session 16:
Limiting beliefs
Cognitive restructuring
Week 9
Session 17:
Systems thinking
Ecosystem mapping
Session 18:
Team coaching foundations
Group dynamics
Week 10
Session 19:
Cultural intelligence
Diversity & inclusion
Session 20:
Mid-programme observed coaching assessment
PHASE 3 (Weeks 11–15)
Professional Practice & Supervised Depth
(EMCC Senior Practitioner / ICF PCC level competencies / COMENSA Professional / QCTO Work Experience)
Week 11
Session 21:
Contracting at organisational level
Stakeholder management
Session 22:
ROI & measuring coaching impact
Week 12
Session 23:
Advanced questioning
Pattern recognition
Session 24:
Shadow coaching and feedback skills
Week 13
Session 25:
Trauma awareness for coaches
Referral boundaries
Session 26:
Ethics at advanced level
Complex case studies
Week 14
Session 27:
Supervision models
Reflective practice
Session 28:
Peer supervision circles
Week 15
Session 29:
Leadership coaching frameworks
Session 30:
Observed coaching assessment 2 (PCC level standard)
PHASE 4 (Weeks 16–20)
Mastery, Integration & Research
(ICF MCC competencies / EMCC Master Practitioner / COMENSA Master Coach / QCTO Portfolio Completion)
Week 16
Session 31:
Masterful presence
Working with intuition
Session 32:
Working with complexity & paradox
Week 17
Session 33:
Systemic constellations (intro)
Session 34:
Advanced team coaching simulations
Week 18
Session 35:
Research literacy for coaches
Evidence-based practice
Session 36:
Writing reflective case studies
Week 19
Session 37:
Business development & professionalisation
Credential pathways for all 4 bodies
Session 38:
Ethics viva practice
Week 20
Session 39:
Final observed coaching (Level 3 standard benchmark)
Session 40:
Portfolio review
Individual development plans
CPD & lifelong learning plan
🧠 Additional Required Elements (Outside 60 Hours)
To truly meet all four bodies:
Mentoring
10 hours (ICF Level 1 minimum)
10 additional for Level 2
Supervision for EMCC Senior/Master
Coaching Practice
100+ hours (Level 2 path)
250+ for Level 3 track
Portfolio
Reflective logs
Recorded sessions
Written case studies
Supervisor reports
Assessment
Knowledge exam
Observed sessions
Ethics viva
Portfolio moderation (QCTO requirement)
Below is a structured set of 60 Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) assignments designed specifically for the Level 123 Coach Training Cohort 1 (IE Group) aligned to:
International Coaching Federation
Coaches and Mentors of South Africa (COMENSA)
European Mentoring and Coaching Council
These assignments support Level 1 certification while preparing learners for Level 2 and Level 3 vertical integration.
They align with the programme structure you shared and provide evidence for:
Knowledge
Practical coaching competence
Reflective practice
Ethics
Professional development
Each assignment produces portfolio evidence required for certification moderation.
(Level 123 Coach Training Programme)
Ethics, mindset, and core coaching skills.
Write a 1,000-word reflection on why you want to become a coach and the impact you hope to create.
Create a comparison table of coaching vs mentoring vs consulting vs therapy.
Write a 500-word summary of the coaching profession globally including the role of ICF, EMCC and COMENSA.
Analyse three ethical dilemmas in coaching and explain how you would respond.
Create a personal coaching code of ethics aligned with global standards.
Write a bias self-assessment reflection exploring your cultural and personal assumptions.
Keep a reflective journal for 7 days on your internal dialogue and reactions.
Create a visual map of the ICF Core Competencies and explain them in your own words.
Write a 500-word explanation of the EMCC competence framework.
Create a coaching session agreement template for use with clients.
Design a coaching intake questionnaire.
Record a 10-minute mock coaching conversation demonstrating contracting.
Write a reflection on psychological safety and trust in coaching relationships.
Observe a conversation and analyse listening levels (internal, focused, global).
Submit a reflection on the difference between advice and coaching questions.
Create a list of 50 powerful coaching questions.
Record a 15-minute coaching practice session using open-ended questions.
Write a reflection on silence in coaching and how it influences insight.
Demonstrate reframing skills using 10 example statements.
Write a reflection on coaching presence and emotional awareness.
Conduct a values elicitation exercise with a peer and write a reflection.
Map a client goal using the GROW model.
Map a second goal using the CLEAR coaching model.
Create a goal design worksheet for coaching clients.
Record a 20-minute coaching session demonstrating active listening.
Write a reflection on the coaching conversation you recorded.
Design a client accountability system template.
Write a reflection on emotional intelligence in coaching conversations.
Explain the neuroscience of habit change in coaching (500 words).
Create a limiting beliefs worksheet for clients.
Conduct a values discovery coaching session and submit notes.
Write a reflection on identity and narrative in coaching.
Create a systems map of a client challenge (stakeholders, influences, environment).
Write a 500-word explanation of systems thinking in coaching.
Conduct a team coaching observation and reflect on group dynamics.
Write a reflection on diversity and cultural awareness in coaching.
Create a cultural intelligence checklist for coaches.
Record a 30-minute coaching session demonstrating coaching structure.
Submit mentor feedback reflection on your coaching practice.
Write a self-evaluation of your coaching strengths and gaps.
Create a coaching impact measurement template.
Write a reflection on measuring ROI in coaching.
Conduct a peer feedback session and document insights.
Analyse a case study involving complex coaching ethics.
Write a reflection on supervision and reflective practice.
Design a coaching business model canvas.
Create a coaching marketing statement and niche description.
Write a 1,000-word reflective case study of a coaching client.
Submit three anonymised coaching session summaries.
Create a personal development plan for the next 3 years as a coach.
Write a reflection on trauma awareness and coaching boundaries.
Create a referral protocol for therapy and counselling.
Participate in a peer supervision session and document learning.
Write a reflection on coaching presence and intuition.
Analyse a complex coaching scenario involving multiple stakeholders.
Create a coaching evaluation questionnaire for clients.
Write a research summary on evidence-based coaching practices.
Prepare a professional coaching portfolio summary.
Submit a final reflective essay on your coaching identity.
Record a final 45-minute coaching session demonstrating competency.
This produces a full Portfolio of Evidence including:
📁 Written reflections
📁 Recorded coaching sessions
📁 Coaching tools and templates
📁 Case studies
📁 Mentor feedback
📁 Self-assessments
📁 Supervision logs
Which satisfies typical evidence expectations for:
COMENSA Level 1
ICF Level 1 pathways
EMCC Foundation/Practitioner
(How assessors score these assignments)
These will make your programme look like a fully accredited QCTO-style coach training system.
create 60 assignments for level 2 coaching
Below is a Level 2 Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) assignment framework for your Level 123 Coach Training Programme.
Level 2 corresponds roughly with:
International Coaching Federation Professional Certified Coach (PCC) skill depth
Coaches and Mentors of South Africa (COMENSA) Professional Coach
European Mentoring and Coaching Council Senior Practitioner
Level 2 focuses on advanced coaching capability, including:
• complex client systems
• leadership coaching
• emotional depth work
• supervision
• pattern recognition
• measurable outcomes
These assignments produce evidence for a professional-level coaching portfolio.
(Level 123 Coach Training Programme)
Assignments 1–15
Write a 1,500-word reflective essay on your coaching philosophy and how it has evolved since Level 1.
Analyse the ICF PCC behavioural markers and describe how they show up in real coaching sessions.
Write a critical comparison of three coaching models (GROW, CLEAR, Solution Focused).
Create a personal coaching framework integrating multiple models.
Conduct a 30-minute coaching session and analyse your use of presence and listening.
Write a reflection on how ego, identity, and role affect coaching relationships.
Design a professional coaching agreement for organisational clients.
Create a stakeholder alignment template for leadership coaching engagements.
Write a case study analysing a complex coaching scenario involving multiple stakeholders.
Create a coaching engagement plan for a 6-month executive coaching programme.
Analyse five examples of unconscious bias in coaching conversations.
Conduct a values and identity coaching session and reflect on insights.
Write a reflection on coaching presence and intuition.
Create a personal supervision reflection log.
Submit a recorded 30-minute coaching session for mentor review.
Assignments 16–30
Explain the neuroscience of behaviour change and its application in coaching.
Create a habit-change coaching intervention plan.
Conduct a limiting beliefs coaching session and document the process.
Write a reflection on emotional triggers in coaching sessions.
Create a framework for working with difficult emotions in coaching.
Analyse a coaching session transcript for hidden assumptions.
Write a reflection on identity-level change in coaching.
Design a coaching tool for narrative reframing.
Conduct a strengths-based coaching session and analyse outcomes.
Create a coaching intervention for decision-making under uncertainty.
Write a reflection on the difference between advice and challenge in coaching.
Analyse a client breakthrough moment in a coaching session.
Create a psychological safety checklist for coaching environments.
Conduct a deep listening coaching session focused on emotions.
Submit a 45-minute coaching session recording demonstrating depth work.
Assignments 31–45
Create a systemic map of an organisational coaching client.
Write a 1,000-word explanation of systems thinking in leadership coaching.
Conduct a coaching session exploring organisational culture.
Create a team coaching session design.
Observe a team meeting and analyse group dynamics.
Write a reflection on power dynamics in coaching relationships.
Create a stakeholder ecosystem map for a leadership client.
Conduct a leadership coaching session and analyse decision frameworks used.
Write a reflection on coaching across cultures.
Create a diversity and inclusion coaching toolkit.
Analyse a real organisational change scenario through a coaching lens.
Design a team coaching intervention for conflict resolution.
Conduct a team reflection session and document outcomes.
Create a coaching measurement dashboard for organisations.
Submit a recorded leadership coaching session.
Assignments 46–60
Participate in a formal coaching supervision session and reflect on learning.
Write a reflection on ethical dilemmas in advanced coaching practice.
Analyse a complex ethical coaching case study.
Design a client evaluation framework for coaching engagements.
Write a case study documenting a full coaching engagement.
Submit five anonymised coaching session summaries.
Create a personal coaching competency development plan.
Design a coaching business growth strategy.
Write a reflection on professional identity as a coach.
Create a research summary on evidence-based coaching practices.
Write a reflective learning report from mentoring sessions.
Analyse three coaching recordings and identify behavioural markers.
Create a professional coaching portfolio summary.
Write a final reflective essay on your development as a professional coach.
Submit a 60-minute recorded coaching session demonstrating Level 2 competence.
This set produces:
📁 10+ recorded coaching sessions
📁 10 case studies
📁 reflective journals
📁 supervision reflections
📁 leadership coaching examples
📁 organisational coaching tools
Which aligns with typical Level 2 requirements:
• 100+ coaching hours
• mentoring
• observed sessions
• reflective practice
• case studies
Assignments 1–15
Write a 2,000-word reflective essay on the evolution of your coaching identity.
Analyse ICF MCC behavioural markers and identify evidence of mastery in real coaching sessions.
Conduct a 60-minute master-level coaching session and analyse your presence and awareness.
Write a reflection on intuition in coaching and when it should be trusted or questioned.
Analyse five coaching transcripts and identify subtle shifts in client awareness.
Write a reflection on the role of silence in transformative coaching.
Create a framework for recognising breakthrough moments in coaching.
Record a coaching session demonstrating deep presence and minimal intervention.
Write a reflection on the difference between technique and mastery.
Conduct a coaching session with no structured model and reflect on emergent dialogue.
Analyse your emotional reactions during coaching sessions.
Write a reflection on holding space for client uncertainty.
Create a map of internal awareness signals during coaching conversations.
Conduct a deep listening coaching experiment focused only on presence.
Submit a mentor-reviewed master-level coaching recording.
Assignments 16–30
Write a 1,500-word explanation of systemic coaching approaches.
Create a systemic constellation map of a client challenge.
Conduct a coaching session exploring organisational dynamics.
Write a reflection on coaching within complex adaptive systems.
Design a coaching intervention for organisational transformation.
Create a framework for working with paradox in leadership coaching.
Conduct a coaching session addressing multiple stakeholder agendas.
Write a reflection on power, hierarchy, and authority in coaching.
Analyse a leadership coaching engagement from a systemic perspective.
Design a team coaching intervention addressing conflict.
Write a reflection on ethical tensions in organisational coaching.
Create a map of organisational culture influences on leadership behaviour.
Conduct a team reflection process and analyse outcomes.
Write a reflection on coaching across cultures and global contexts.
Submit a recorded leadership coaching session demonstrating systemic awareness.
Assignments 31–45
Write a reflection on the role of coaching supervision in professional practice.
Participate in three coaching supervision sessions and document insights.
Create a supervision reflection journal covering 10 coaching sessions.
Mentor a Level 1 coach and document their development journey.
Write a reflection on the ethics of mentoring emerging coaches.
Observe two coaching sessions by other coaches and provide feedback.
Write a reflection on giving developmental feedback to coaches.
Design a coaching supervision framework.
Analyse three coaching recordings and identify development areas.
Create a coaching mentor feedback report.
Write a reflection on coaching competence development over time.
Facilitate a peer supervision circle and document outcomes.
Analyse ethical dilemmas raised during supervision.
Write a reflection on professional responsibility as a senior coach.
Submit evidence of mentoring at least two developing coaches.
Assignments 46–60
Conduct a literature review on evidence-based coaching research.
Write a research paper on the effectiveness of coaching interventions.
Design a coaching impact measurement study.
Collect feedback data from coaching clients and analyse results.
Write a case study of a complex long-term coaching engagement.
Publish an article or white paper on coaching practice.
Design a new coaching model or framework.
Write a critical reflection on current coaching industry trends.
Conduct a presentation or workshop on coaching practice.
Write a reflection on the ethical future of coaching and AI.
Create a professional contribution plan for the coaching field.
Write a reflective synthesis of your coaching philosophy and research insights.
Compile a comprehensive coaching portfolio documenting your work.
Write a final reflective thesis on your development as a master coach.
Submit a 90-minute master-level coaching session demonstrating mastery competencies.
This portfolio produces evidence including:
📁 Master-level coaching recordings
📁 Research papers
📁 supervision reflections
📁 mentoring evidence
📁 systemic coaching case studies
📁 leadership coaching engagements
📁 professional publications
These align with typical Master Coach expectations:
• 500–2500 coaching hours
• supervision
• mentoring other coaches
• research-informed practice
• contribution to the profession
Here’s a clear, structured guide to becoming a Coaching Supervisor and Mentor Coach, grounded in the evidence-based, reflective approach associated with Jonathan Passmore and Judit Ábri von Bartheld:
A coaching supervisor supports the coach, not the client.
Focus: reflection, ethics, development, and systemic awareness.
Explores:
Blind spots
Emotional responses
Ethical dilemmas
Patterns across clients
Works at deeper levels than skills (identity, presence, system dynamics).
A mentor coach supports the coach in developing ICF Core Competencies.
Focus: performance improvement and credential readiness.
Involves:
Reviewing recorded sessions
Giving structured feedback
Aligning to ICF markers
Works at skill and competency level.
👉 Simple distinction:
Mentor Coach = performance + competencies
Supervisor = reflection + professional maturity
Strong foundation as a practicing coach
Typically PCC (or working toward PCC/MCC) with the International Coaching Federation
Significant coaching hours (often 500–1000+)
Demonstrated ethical practice
Commitment to continuous development
For supervision: maturity, depth, psychological awareness
For mentor coaching: strong grasp of ICF competencies and assessment criteria
Deeply learn the ICF Core Competencies and PCC markers
Observe and analyse coaching sessions
Train in giving structured, evidence-based feedback
Practice reviewing recordings
Offer mentor coaching to credentialing coaches
Precision in feedback
Linking behaviour to competencies
Identifying gaps vs strengths
Holding a supportive but challenging stance
Feedback is specific, behavioural, and non-judgmental
Coaches leave with clear improvement actions
Development is measurable over time
Complete a coaching supervision qualification (often 9–12 months)
Study:
Reflective practice
Systems thinking
Ethics and boundaries
Psychological frameworks
Engage in your own supervision
Begin supervising other coaches
Build experience across diverse cases
Reflective cycles
Systems-based supervision
Developmental models
Ethical decision-making frameworks
Deep listening beyond words
Holding complexity and ambiguity
Working with emotions and identity
Facilitating reflective dialogue
Area
Mentor Coaching
Supervision
Focus
Skills & competencies
Reflection & development
Goal
Credential readiness
Professional maturity
Level
Behavioural
Psychological & systemic
Method
Feedback on sessions
Reflective dialogue
Timeframe
Short-term
Ongoing
Outcome
Measurable improvement
Deep awareness & growth
Both roles require strong ethical grounding
Supervisors go deeper into:
Ethical dilemmas
Power dynamics
Client impact
Mentor coaches ensure:
Alignment with ICF standards
Competency integrity
In both roles:
You are developing the coach, not solving client problems
Offer packages for:
ACC / PCC preparation
Session reviews
Position yourself as:
“ICF Credentialing Specialist”
Offer:
Monthly supervision groups
1:1 reflective supervision
Position yourself as:
“Coach Development Partner”
Coaching maturity develops in stages
Reflection is as important as action
Supervision is essential for ethical, sustainable practice
Evidence-based approaches improve quality
Coaches must continually examine:
Their assumptions
Their impact
Their development
Becoming either requires a shift from:
Doing coaching → Developing coaches
Providing answers → Facilitating reflection
Focusing on clients → Focusing on the coach’s system
Mentor coaching gets coaches certified and competent
Supervision makes coaches deep, ethical, and masterful
Here’s a comprehensive 100-line breakdown of reflective cycles, combining practical, theoretical, and applied insights, suitable for coaching, mentoring, or professional development contexts:
Reflection is thinking with purpose.
Reflective cycles structure this thinking.
They encourage learning from experience.
Reflection builds self-awareness.
Reflection strengthens professional practice.
Cycles provide a repeatable process.
Reflection bridges experience and insight.
They support personal and professional growth.
Reflection reduces reactive behaviour.
Reflection enables deliberate learning.
Cycles make reflection systematic.
They clarify complex situations.
Reflection identifies patterns in behaviour.
It helps uncover assumptions.
Reflection highlights blind spots.
It deepens understanding of others.
Reflection enhances emotional intelligence.
It informs future action.
Reflection develops critical thinking.
It supports ethical decision-making.
Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle is widely used.
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle links action and reflection.
Schön’s Reflection-in-Action focuses on immediate reflection.
Schön’s Reflection-on-Action considers post-event reflection.
Rolfe et al.’s framework asks: What? So what? Now what?
Johns’ Model emphasizes structured guided reflection.
Each model has stages for thinking and learning.
Models guide rather than constrain.
Selecting a model depends on context.
Models help track development over time.
Stage 1: Description – What happened?
Stage 2: Feelings – What were you thinking and feeling?
Stage 3: Evaluation – What was good or bad about it?
Stage 4: Analysis – Why did it happen?
Stage 5: Conclusion – What else could you have done?
Stage 6: Action Plan – If it happened again, what would you do?
Each stage encourages depth of thinking.
Following the sequence prevents superficial reflection.
Emotional awareness is critical at the feelings stage.
Action planning ensures learning is applied.
Stage 1: Concrete Experience – Engage fully.
Stage 2: Reflective Observation – Step back and observe.
Stage 3: Abstract Conceptualization – Form insights.
Stage 4: Active Experimentation – Apply new learning.
Reflection occurs between stages 2 and 3.
The cycle is continuous and iterative.
Experience alone does not guarantee learning.
Reflection transforms experience into knowledge.
Experimentation validates insights.
The cycle emphasizes learning from doing.
Reflection occurs during the event.
Allows real-time adaptation.
Supports improvisation in complex situations.
Requires awareness and presence.
Helps correct mistakes immediately.
Supports coaching in live sessions.
Encourages mindful attention.
Requires confidence and skill.
Reflection-in-action improves decision-making.
Builds professional agility.
Reflection occurs after the event.
Involves reviewing outcomes and processes.
Supports long-term learning.
Allows emotional processing.
Encourages systemic thinking.
Identifies root causes of issues.
Helps refine skills for next time.
Supports supervisor and mentor coaching work.
Enables structured debriefs.
Builds insight into recurring patterns.
“What?” – Describe the situation factually.
“So what?” – Interpret meaning and implications.
“Now what?” – Decide on action steps.
Simple, adaptable, and practical.
Encourages critical thinking.
Supports rapid application in coaching.
Facilitates learning in groups.
Useful for reflective journaling.
Encourages accountability.
Encourages next-step planning.
Emphasizes guided questions.
Explores context deeply.
Examines internal and external factors.
Connects theory to practice.
Encourages self-awareness.
Promotes ethical reflection.
Supports professional identity development.
Useful in supervision.
Integrates values and beliefs into reflection.
Provides actionable insights.
Coaches reflect after client sessions.
Supervisors model reflective cycles.
Reflection informs mentor coaching feedback.
Supports development of ICF competencies.
Enhances decision-making in complex cases.
Guides ethical responses to dilemmas.
Reflection reduces unconscious bias.
Supports continuous professional growth.
Journaling is a practical reflective tool.
Reflective cycles turn experience into expertise.
I can also create a visual “Reflective Cycle Poster” for coaching or supervision, summarizing all stages across Gibbs, Kolb, Schön, and Rolfe in one graphic, ready to print or share online.
I can expand your 100 lines on systems-based supervision by adding a practical or illustrative example for each line. This will result in a 200-line detailed guide, pairing theory with applied insight. Here’s the fully expanded version:
Supervision supports the coach, not the client directly.
Example: A coach brings a client case to supervision to explore how they handled a challenging conversation.
Systems-based supervision views the coach in context.
Example: Examining how a coach’s organisation affects their approach to client sessions.
Coaches operate within multiple systems: personal, professional, organisational.
Example: A coach feels tension between personal values and organisational expectations.
The system affects behaviour, decisions, and outcomes.
Example: A team culture valuing speed over quality influences how a coach approaches deadlines.
Supervision ensures ethical and effective practice.
Example: Discussing whether it’s appropriate to share client observations with leadership.
Reflective practice is central to supervision.
Example: A coach writes a journal entry after each session to process what happened.
Supervisors help coaches explore complexity.
Example: Unpacking why a client consistently resists goal-setting.
Supervision enhances self-awareness and competence.
Example: Recognising personal triggers when a client becomes defensive.
It prevents professional isolation.
Example: Monthly supervision meetings help coaches feel supported and connected.
Systems thinking recognises interconnections.
Example: Seeing how team dynamics, organisational policies, and client emotions are linked.
Patterns repeat across client cases.
Example: Several clients display procrastination, revealing a systemic organisational culture issue.
Context shapes coaching choices.
Example: Choosing a more directive style when a client faces urgent deadlines.
Emotional dynamics in the system influence outcomes.
Example: Tension between managers affects the client’s willingness to take risks.
Supervisors support navigating these dynamics.
Example: Coach discusses strategies to manage client anxiety caused by organisational politics.
Coaches’ personal systems influence their practice.
Example: A coach’s perfectionism leads to over-preparing for sessions.
Professional identity develops within systems.
Example: A coach’s confidence grows after successfully navigating multiple organisational cultures.
Systems-based supervision is evidence-informed.
Example: Using research on organisational change to inform reflection discussions.
Supervision improves resilience.
Example: Discussing setbacks in client sessions reduces stress and prevents burnout.
Ethical dilemmas are explored systemically.
Example: Deciding whether to escalate a client issue that violates organisational policy.
It encourages holistic understanding.
Example: Considering client behaviour, team dynamics, and organisational structure together.
Coaches are part of broader systems.
Example: Recognising how the HR department affects the client’s career development.
All systems are interconnected.
Example: A change in management style influences team morale and coaching outcomes.
Behaviour is influenced by the system.
Example: Employees avoid innovation because the organisation punishes mistakes.
Supervisors help coaches map these influences.
Example: Creating a diagram showing relationships between stakeholders affecting a client.
Systemic awareness improves decision-making.
Example: A coach chooses interventions that respect organisational hierarchy.
Reflection links action to context.
Example: Considering how a client’s past experiences affect their current choices.
Emotional responses often signal system dynamics.
Example: A coach notices anger in a client triggered by office politics.
Boundaries define system roles.
Example: Clarifying what the coach can and cannot influence within a client’s organisation.
Power and authority are systemic factors.
Example: A senior manager resists coaching because it challenges their authority.
Supervision identifies systemic stressors.
Example: Highlighting unrealistic deadlines affecting multiple clients.
Systems include clients, organisations, teams, and society.
Example: A client’s cultural background shapes their response to feedback.
Coaches’ values affect systemic interactions.
Example: A coach valuing collaboration mediates between conflicting departments.
Supervisors help detect blind spots.
Example: Noticing a coach unconsciously favours clients who are more vocal.
Patterns may be functional or dysfunctional.
Example: Teams that avoid conflict may be productive but suppress innovation.
Insight comes from observing system interactions.
Example: Seeing how two teams’ competition affects client behaviour.
Feedback within supervision is systemic.
Example: Discussing how feedback to one client might ripple through the organisation.
The supervisor facilitates awareness of interdependencies.
Example: Showing a coach how their approach affects both clients and colleagues.
Systems-based approaches prevent isolated interventions.
Example: Avoiding solutions that ignore organisational culture.
Contextual thinking avoids one-size-fits-all solutions.
Example: Tailoring coaching approaches to different departments rather than using a standard script.
Systemic understanding enhances effectiveness.
Example: Coaches intervene in ways that align with organisational strategy.
Bowenian Family Systems model applies to organisational dynamics.
Example: A coach notices triangulation between a manager, employee, and HR.
Lewin’s Change Theory informs system transitions.
Example: A client struggles during a company restructuring (“unfreeze–change–refreeze”).
Complexity Theory addresses unpredictability.
Example: Small leadership changes create unexpected ripple effects across teams.
Cybernetic models examine feedback loops.
Example: A manager’s criticism leads to disengagement, reinforcing more criticism.
Organizational Culture models reveal norms and values.
Example: A culture of silence prevents honest feedback in coaching sessions.
Systemic Constellation techniques explore hidden relationships.
Example: Visual mapping reveals an unspoken loyalty conflict in a team.
Each model helps visualise patterns and influences.
Example: A diagram helps a coach see recurring conflict structures.
Models provide language for reflection.
Example: Using “feedback loops” helps explain repeating behaviours.
Choosing the right model depends on context.
Example: Complexity theory suits fast-changing environments better than linear models.
Models complement reflective cycles.
Example: A coach uses Gibbs’ Cycle alongside systems mapping.
Trust is foundational.
Example: A coach feels safe sharing a failed session openly.
Confidentiality is essential.
Example: Client identities are anonymised in supervision discussions.
Supervisors model professional behaviour.
Example: A supervisor demonstrates active listening and neutrality.
Supervisors hold complexity without judgment.
Example: Multiple conflicting perspectives are explored without taking sides.
The coach is central in supervision.
Example: The supervisor focuses on the coach’s experience, not solving the client’s issue.
Supervisors balance support and challenge.
Example: Encouraging reflection while questioning assumptions.
Curiosity drives systemic exploration.
Example: Asking “What else might be influencing this situation?”
Questions invite reflection.
Example: “What role are you playing in this system?”
Observations uncover patterns.
Example: Noticing repeated frustration across different clients.
The relationship enables safe exploration of challenges.
Example: Coaches openly discuss ethical dilemmas without fear.
Explore how organisational culture influences coaching.
Example: A results-driven culture discourages reflective thinking.
Map team dynamics affecting clients.
Example: Identifying alliances and conflicts within a leadership team.
Identify hidden stakeholders.
Example: A sponsor influencing outcomes behind the scenes.
Consider political pressures.
Example: A client avoids decisions due to internal politics.
Recognise conflicting priorities.
Example: A client torn between team wellbeing and profit targets.
Observe relational patterns.
Example: A client consistently defers to authority figures.
Examine historical context.
Example: Past leadership failures influence current distrust.
Analyse systemic barriers.
Example: Rigid hierarchies block innovation.
Track feedback loops.
Example: Stress leads to poor communication, increasing stress further.
Understand role expectations within the system.
Example: A manager struggles with unclear leadership expectations.
Explore coach-client relationships systemically.
Example: The client projects authority issues onto the coach.
Examine multi-level influences (individual, team, org).
Example: A personal confidence issue is reinforced by team culture.
Reflect on emotional climate in the system.
Example: A tense workplace affects coaching openness.
Identify systemic stress points.
Example: High turnover signals deeper organisational issues.
Recognise recurring conflict patterns.
Example: Teams repeatedly clash during decision-making phases.
Assess alignment with organisational goals.
Example: Coaching goals conflict with company KPIs.
Evaluate systemic support structures.
Example: Lack of mentoring limits leadership development.
Map communication flows.
Example: Information bottlenecks slow decision-making.
Analyse decision-making patterns.
Example: Decisions are delayed due to consensus culture.
Consider how policies influence outcomes.
Example: Strict policies discourage risk-taking.
Reflection is structured around the system.
Example: Reviewing how different stakeholders influenced outcomes.
Feedback links behaviour to systemic impact.
Example: Highlighting how a coach’s approach affects team dynamics.
Supervisors highlight systemic blind spots.
Example: A coach overlooks organisational politics affecting the client.
Reflection considers both micro and macro influences.
Example: Individual behaviour and company culture are both examined.
Feedback is descriptive, not judgmental.
Example: “I noticed you redirected the conversation when emotions arose.”
Coaches reflect on their role within the system.
Example: Recognising how their assumptions shape sessions.
Emotional responses provide diagnostic insight.
Example: Feeling frustrated may indicate systemic resistance.
Reflection cycles integrate systemic understanding.
Example: Using Kolb’s cycle to analyse systemic interactions.
Supervision is iterative and developmental.
Example: Each session builds on previous insights.
Outcomes inform ongoing professional growth.
Example: Coaches adjust approaches based on supervision insights.
Deep listening to systemic cues.
Example: Noticing patterns beyond the immediate story.
Observing patterns across multiple levels.
Example: Identifying similarities between different client cases.
Asking systemic, open-ended questions.
Example: “Who else is affected by this situation?”
Maintaining neutrality while exploring complexity.
Example: Avoiding taking sides in organisational conflicts.
Supporting ethical decision-making.
Example: Helping a coach decide whether to escalate an issue.
Facilitating reflective dialogue.
Example: Encouraging deeper exploration through questioning.
Mapping influence and power dynamics.
Example: Identifying key decision-makers affecting outcomes.
Encouraging critical thinking and insight.
Example: Challenging assumptions respectfully.
Integrating theory and practice.
Example: Applying systems theory to real coaching scenarios.
Building coach resilience and professional mastery.
Example: Supporting coaches to manage stress and complexity effectively.