Starts Tomorrow Book Now!
The European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC) uses a framework called the EMCC Competence Framework for mentoring and coaching.
For Level 1 (Foundation), the competencies describe the basic capability expected of a beginning professional coach or mentor. Level 1 focuses on awareness, ethical practice, and fundamental coaching skills rather than mastery.
The EMCC framework is structured around 8 competency domains. Below are the Level 1 expectations.
A Level 1 coach demonstrates basic awareness of self and impact on the coaching relationship.
Competencies include:
Shows awareness of personal values and beliefs.
Recognises how personal experiences influence coaching.
Reflects on strengths and development areas.
Demonstrates willingness to learn and improve.
Recognises emotional responses during coaching.
Shows openness to feedback.
Begins developing a reflective practice.
Understands the importance of supervision and development.
Level 1 coaches actively engage in learning and development.
Competencies include:
Engages in training and learning related to coaching.
Reflects on coaching experiences to improve practice.
Seeks feedback from clients and peers.
Demonstrates curiosity about improving coaching capability.
Maintains awareness of personal limitations.
Shows willingness to develop professionally.
Begins building a professional identity as a coach.
Level 1 coaches understand the importance of a clear coaching agreement.
Competencies include:
Clarifies the purpose of the coaching relationship.
Explains coaching roles and expectations.
Establishes basic agreements with clients.
Ensures confidentiality is understood.
Clarifies session objectives.
Checks client understanding of the coaching process.
Recognises boundaries of coaching.
Level 1 coaches establish a safe and respectful coaching environment.
Competencies include:
Builds rapport with the client.
Demonstrates empathy and respect.
Creates a safe space for conversation.
Maintains a supportive and non-judgmental attitude.
Shows interest in the client’s perspective.
Encourages openness and trust.
Demonstrates active engagement in conversation.
Level 1 coaches help clients explore ideas and gain insight.
Competencies include:
Uses questions to stimulate thinking.
Encourages reflection by the client.
Supports exploration of options.
Helps clients identify possible solutions.
Facilitates awareness of new perspectives.
Allows the client time to think.
Encourages learning from experience.
Level 1 coaches support clients in identifying actions.
Competencies include:
Helps clients define goals.
Supports clients in identifying next steps.
Encourages accountability.
Checks progress towards goals.
Supports the client in identifying resources.
Helps translate insight into action.
Level 1 coaches use simple coaching tools appropriately.
Competencies include:
Uses basic coaching models when appropriate.
Applies questioning techniques effectively.
Uses active listening.
Encourages client reflection.
Maintains focus on the client’s agenda.
Avoids excessive advice-giving.
Level 1 coaches follow professional ethical standards.
Competencies include:
Demonstrates integrity and professionalism.
Maintains confidentiality.
Recognises ethical boundaries.
Works within the limits of competence.
Refers clients when appropriate.
Shows respect for diversity and culture.
Follows professional codes of conduct.
A Level 1 EMCC coach:
Understands basic coaching principles
Can conduct structured coaching conversations
Maintains ethical awareness
Demonstrates self-reflection and learning mindset
However, they are still developing mastery in areas such as:
Deep psychological insight
Complex coaching interventions
Advanced contracting and systemic awareness
These appear more strongly at EMCC Level 2 (Practitioner) and Level 3 (Senior Practitioner).
If you want, I can also show you something very useful for assessments:
EMCC Level 1 vs ICF ACC vs COMENSA Coach comparison
(in terms of hours, skill expectations, and difficulty).
Many coaches misunderstand this, and it’s critical if you're positioning yourself professionally.
yes
Here is a clear comparison of the three major coaching credential frameworks:
European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC)
International Coaching Federation (ICF)
Coaches and Mentors of South Africa (COMENSA)
This comparison focuses on the entry / early professional level, since this is where most coaches begin.
Level: Foundation
This is the entry-level professional standard.
Focus:
understanding coaching basics
ethical practice
reflective practice
structured conversations
Typical candidate:
new coaches
managers using coaching skills
beginner professional coaches
Level: ACC – Associate Certified Coach
This is the first professional credential from ICF.
Focus:
demonstrated coaching competency
professional coaching hours
coaching presence and ethics
Typical candidate:
practicing professional coach
Level: Credentialed Coach (CC)
This is the first professional designation.
Focus:
ethical practice
coaching competence
supervision and reflective practice
Typical candidate:
practicing coach in South Africa
Typical training requirement:
~50–60 hours coaching training
Programs must align with the EMCC competence framework.
Training requirement:
60 hours approved coaching training
Training must be either:
Level 1 program
or
ACSTH program
Training requirement:
minimum 60 hours coach training
Training must come from a COMENSA-recognised provider.
Typical requirement:
50 hours coaching practice
This can include:
peer coaching
practice clients
real clients
Requirement:
100 hours coaching experience
75 hours must be paid
This is significantly more demanding than EMCC Foundation.
Requirement:
~100 hours coaching practice
Typically includes:
coaching log
reflective practice evidence
Requires supervision awareness, but formal supervision hours are limited at Level 1.
However EMCC strongly encourages supervision culture.
Requires:
10 hours mentor coaching
With a qualified ICF mentor coach.
This is mandatory.
Requires:
coach supervision
reflective practice evidence
Supervision is a core element of COMENSA development.
Assessment typically includes:
portfolio of evidence
reflective practice
coaching log
supervisor feedback
Assessment includes:
performance evaluation of recorded session
coaching knowledge assessment
credential review
ICF evaluation is very competency focused.
Assessment includes:
portfolio submission
recorded coaching session
reflective practice
panel evaluation
Difficulty: Moderate
Strengths:
reflective practice
developmental learning
Less emphasis on:
performance assessment
Difficulty: High
ICF places strong emphasis on:
coaching conversation quality
deep listening
powerful questioning
client-led coaching
ICF evaluators are strict.
Difficulty: Moderate to High
Strong emphasis on:
ethics
supervision
reflective practice
cultural awareness
Particularly relevant in South Africa’s coaching ecosystem.
Highest global recognition.
Often required by:
multinational companies
global coaching platforms
leadership development programs
Strong recognition in:
Europe
corporate mentoring programs
leadership development
Strong recognition in:
South Africa
African coaching networks
corporate HR ecosystems locally
Many professional coaches pursue multiple credentials.
Common path:
Start with EMCC Foundation
Move to ICF ACC
Later add COMENSA PCC equivalent
This builds:
global credibility
local recognition
professional depth
Credentialing is not just about hours.
Assessors look for signals of coaching maturity, such as:
curiosity over advice
client-led exploration
emotional attunement
awareness of bias
reflective practice
Without these, even experienced coaches fail assessments.
Summarising the EMCC Competence Framework, organised around the core competency domains of the European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC). The framework applies to coaches and mentors across all accreditation levels.
Coaches develop awareness of their own values.
Coaches recognise personal beliefs that influence interactions.
Coaches understand how personal experiences shape perspective.
Coaches recognise emotional reactions during sessions.
Coaches reflect on their strengths and limitations.
Coaches monitor personal biases and assumptions.
Coaches acknowledge the impact of their presence on clients.
Coaches demonstrate openness to feedback.
Coaches practice ongoing self-reflection.
Coaches remain aware of their personal development needs.
Coaches recognise when personal issues may affect coaching.
Coaches maintain awareness of boundaries in professional relationships.
Coaches commit to continuous learning.
Coaches engage in reflective practice regularly.
Coaches seek professional supervision when appropriate.
Coaches update their knowledge of coaching methods.
Coaches participate in training and development activities.
Coaches evaluate their coaching effectiveness.
Coaches remain curious about improving their practice.
Coaches seek feedback from clients and peers.
Coaches demonstrate willingness to challenge their own thinking.
Coaches maintain professional competence.
Coaches actively reflect on lessons learned from experience.
Coaches document their professional development journey.
Coaches establish clear agreements with clients.
Coaches clarify the purpose of coaching engagements.
Coaches define roles and responsibilities.
Coaches set expectations for the coaching relationship.
Coaches ensure confidentiality agreements are understood.
Coaches confirm goals and desired outcomes.
Coaches clarify session structure.
Coaches revisit agreements when necessary.
Coaches manage expectations around coaching results.
Coaches ensure ethical boundaries are respected.
Coaches explain the coaching process clearly.
Coaches confirm commitment from the client.
Coaches create a safe environment for discussion.
Coaches demonstrate empathy and respect.
Coaches show genuine interest in the client’s perspective.
Coaches build trust with clients.
Coaches remain non-judgmental in conversations.
Coaches listen attentively to the client.
Coaches respect client autonomy.
Coaches encourage openness and honesty.
Coaches demonstrate authenticity.
Coaches respond appropriately to emotional cues.
Coaches foster psychological safety.
Coaches maintain professionalism throughout the relationship.
Coaches ask thought-provoking questions.
Coaches encourage clients to reflect deeply.
Coaches explore underlying assumptions.
Coaches help clients gain new perspectives.
Coaches challenge limiting beliefs respectfully.
Coaches support the discovery of personal insights.
Coaches encourage exploration of possibilities.
Coaches stimulate curiosity in clients.
Coaches help clients identify patterns.
Coaches promote self-awareness in clients.
Coaches encourage independent thinking.
Coaches facilitate meaningful learning experiences.
Coaches support clients in defining clear goals.
Coaches help clients identify practical actions.
Coaches encourage responsibility for progress.
Coaches track progress toward objectives.
Coaches support the client’s decision-making process.
Coaches encourage commitment to action.
Coaches help clients evaluate possible options.
Coaches support sustainable behaviour change.
Coaches reinforce accountability.
Coaches help translate insight into action steps.
Coaches revisit goals during the coaching journey.
Coaches celebrate progress and learning.
Coaches use appropriate coaching frameworks.
Coaches apply questioning techniques effectively.
Coaches use active listening techniques.
Coaches encourage reflective thinking.
Coaches adapt techniques to the client’s needs.
Coaches apply tools ethically and appropriately.
Coaches avoid over-reliance on rigid models.
Coaches select methods aligned with coaching objectives.
Coaches remain flexible in approach.
Coaches focus on client learning rather than technique.
Coaches avoid imposing personal solutions.
Coaches support the client’s exploration through structured dialogue.
Coaches maintain confidentiality at all times.
Coaches act with integrity and professionalism.
Coaches respect cultural diversity.
Coaches avoid conflicts of interest.
Coaches operate within their competence.
Coaches refer clients when necessary.
Coaches maintain professional boundaries.
Coaches adhere to ethical codes and standards.
Coaches respect client autonomy.
Coaches protect client wellbeing.
Coaches act responsibly in professional relationships.
Coaches maintain transparency with clients.
Coaches respect legal and regulatory requirements.
Coaches promote ethical awareness in coaching practice.
Coaches demonstrate accountability for their actions.
Coaches uphold the reputation of the coaching profession.
Here is a broad list of personal values commonly used in coaching, self-reflection, and leadership development. You can use these for values clarification exercises, coaching sessions, journaling, or mission statement work.
Integrity
Honesty
Authenticity
Accountability
Responsibility
Transparency
Fairness
Trustworthiness
Courage
Moral clarity
Learning
Growth
Curiosity
Self-improvement
Wisdom
Reflection
Awareness
Knowledge
Mastery
Development
Love
Compassion
Kindness
Respect
Loyalty
Empathy
Generosity
Forgiveness
Connection
Friendship
Excellence
Success
Achievement
Discipline
Determination
Focus
Productivity
Drive
Hard work
Competence
Freedom
Independence
Autonomy
Self-reliance
Self-expression
Personal agency
Initiative
Exploration
Adventure
Individuality
Service
Helping others
Generosity
Impact
Community
Leadership
Mentorship
Empowerment
Social responsibility
Legacy
Peace
Gratitude
Mindfulness
Inner balance
Harmony
Spirituality
Faith
Hope
Purpose
Meaning
Health
Vitality
Balance
Stability
Simplicity
Security
Comfort
Relaxation
Playfulness
Enjoyment
Creativity
Innovation
Imagination
Expression
Inspiration
Artistic expression
Vision
Curiosity
Experimentation
Originality
Diversity
Inclusion
Justice
Equality
Tolerance
Cultural awareness
Collaboration
Partnership
Citizenship
Unity
Your personal experiences shape your coaching in powerful ways. They influence how you listen, interpret, ask questions, build trust, and respond to clients. When you are aware of this influence, your experiences become assets; when you are unaware, they can become biases or blind spots.
Below are the key ways personal experience affects coaching.
Every coach carries a mental map of the world built from life experiences.
Your upbringing, education, career, relationships, and challenges influence:
what you believe is possible
how you interpret problems
what you see as success
what you think people should do
Example:
If you built your career through hard discipline and persistence, you may unconsciously believe success always comes from working harder. A client who values balance may require a different perspective.
Awareness helps you avoid projecting your worldview onto clients.
Past experiences can create automatic judgments.
Common coaching biases include:
Confirmation bias – noticing things that confirm your beliefs
Affinity bias – feeling more comfortable with clients similar to you
Success bias – assuming your path will work for others
Cultural bias – interpreting behaviour through your own culture
Without awareness, these biases can limit client exploration.
Personal challenges often deepen empathy.
Experiences such as:
career setbacks
leadership roles
burnout
major life transitions
help coaches connect with clients emotionally.
However, empathy must remain curious rather than assumptive.
Example:
Instead of saying:
"I understand exactly what you're going through."
A coach might say:
"What has this experience been like for you?"
This keeps the focus on the client’s experience, not the coach’s story.
Some client topics may trigger strong reactions.
Examples include:
failure
financial stress
family conflict
career change
authority issues
Triggers can lead to:
advice-giving
over-identification
emotional reactions
shifting focus away from the client
Self-awareness helps you notice these reactions in real time.
Your background influences which questions naturally occur to you.
For example:
A coach with business experience may ask questions about:
strategy
goals
productivity
A coach with psychology experience may focus on:
emotions
beliefs
identity
Both perspectives can be valuable, but coaching requires flexibility and curiosity.
Your life experiences influence your natural style.
Some coaches become:
reflective and calm
energetic and motivational
analytical and structured
intuitive and exploratory
There is no single correct style, but awareness helps you adapt to the client.
Clients often trust coaches who have relevant life experience.
For example:
leadership experience with leadership clients
career change experience with career clients
entrepreneurial experience with founders
However, coaching competence is not about having lived the same experience, but about facilitating thinking and insight.
When used appropriately, personal experiences can provide:
perspective
empathy
contextual understanding
meaningful questions
But in coaching, your story should rarely be the focus.
The goal is to help the client discover their own path.
Professional coaches constantly reflect on:
How am I interpreting this situation?
What assumptions am I making?
What emotions are arising in me?
Is this about the client or about me?
This reflection helps maintain coaching neutrality and presence.
Many coaches use reflective practices such as:
journaling after sessions
supervision with another coach
feedback from clients
mindfulness practices
These help coaches continuously monitor how their experiences influence their work.
Key insight:
Your experiences do not need to be removed from coaching.
They become powerful when you are aware of them, reflect on them, and prevent them from limiting the client’s exploration.
A Coaching Bias Map is a reflective tool used by coaches to identify how their beliefs, experiences, assumptions, and emotional triggers may influence coaching conversations. It helps a coach move from unconscious bias → conscious awareness → intentional practice.
This is commonly used in supervision, reflective journaling, and coach development.
Your personal history influences how you interpret client situations.
Reflective questions:
What life experiences shape how I see success?
What struggles have strongly shaped my beliefs?
Do I assume others should follow similar paths?
Do I believe certain approaches always work?
Example:
A coach who built success through risk-taking may unconsciously encourage entrepreneurship.
Coaches sometimes assume their path is the best path.
Questions to explore:
Do I assume my career path is optimal?
Do I encourage decisions that mirror my journey?
Do I subtly steer clients toward choices I made?
Signal to watch for:
Giving advice disguised as questions.
Example:
"Have you considered starting your own business?"
We naturally feel more comfortable with people who are similar to us.
Areas where affinity bias may occur:
age
culture
profession
personality
education
Reflection:
Which clients feel easiest for me to coach?
Which clients feel challenging?
Why?
Culture shapes how we interpret behavior, communication, and success.
Questions:
What cultural assumptions do I carry?
Do I assume my communication style is normal?
Do I misinterpret silence or indirect communication?
Example:
Direct communication may be valued in one culture but considered disrespectful in another.
Coaches with strong professional experience may drift into consulting or advising.
Reflection:
Do I feel an urge to fix problems?
Do I provide solutions too quickly?
Do I interrupt client discovery?
Signal:
Client asks fewer reflective questions and waits for guidance.
High-achieving coaches sometimes assume everyone wants:
higher performance
promotion
financial success
Reflection:
Do I assume progress equals achievement?
Do I undervalue goals like balance or wellbeing?
Example:
A client may want less responsibility, not more.
Certain client topics may trigger emotional reactions.
Common triggers:
failure
conflict
authority
money
relationships
burnout
Reflection:
Which topics create strong emotional responses in me?
When do I feel uncomfortable during sessions?
Signals:
changing the topic
overempathising
trying to solve the problem quickly
This occurs when we look for evidence that confirms our existing beliefs.
Reflection:
Do I interpret client stories through my own assumptions?
Do I ignore information that challenges my view?
Example:
Believing a client lacks confidence when they may actually lack clarity.
Your identity can influence how you interpret others.
Examples include:
professional identity
leadership identity
generational identity
socioeconomic background
Reflection:
How does my identity shape how I evaluate clients?
Every coach has a natural style.
Examples:
analytical
motivational
reflective
strategic
emotional
Reflection:
Do I overuse my preferred style?
Do I adapt to the client’s needs?
Identify biases that might appear in your coaching.
Ask yourself after sessions:
What assumptions did I make?
When did I feel emotionally activated?
Did I influence the client's thinking?
Develop strategies such as:
slowing down questioning
returning focus to the client
exploring alternative perspectives
Discuss bias patterns with a coach supervisor to deepen awareness.
Think of coaching influence as three circles:
1. The Client’s World
Their beliefs, experiences, goals.
2. The Coach’s World
Your experiences, biases, emotions.
3. The Coaching Space
Where awareness allows the client’s thinking to expand.
Professional coaching requires protecting the coaching space from being dominated by the coach’s worldview.
Key Insight
Great coaches are not bias-free.
Great coaches are bias-aware.
Self-awareness, reflection, and supervision ensure that the client’s thinking remains the centre of the coaching conversation.
Here are 50 common coaching biases that can influence coaching conversations. Being aware of these helps coaches maintain neutrality, curiosity, and client-centred practice, which is emphasised in professional coaching frameworks used by organisations such as the International Coaching Federation, European Mentoring and Coaching Council, and Coaches and Mentors of South Africa.
Confirmation bias – seeking information that confirms your beliefs.
Anchoring bias – relying too heavily on the first information given.
Availability bias – assuming recent experiences are most relevant.
Overconfidence bias – believing your interpretation is correct.
Halo effect – letting one positive trait shape overall perception.
Horn effect – letting one negative trait shape overall perception.
Attribution bias – attributing behaviour to personality rather than context.
Projection bias – assuming clients think or feel like you do.
Pattern recognition bias – seeing patterns that may not exist.
Framing bias – interpreting information based on wording or framing.
Success path bias – assuming your success formula works for others.
Career bias – encouraging career decisions similar to yours.
Entrepreneurial bias – pushing clients toward entrepreneurship.
Corporate bias – assuming corporate success is the best path.
Education bias – valuing formal education above other learning paths.
Hard work bias – assuming effort always leads to success.
Resilience bias – expecting others to cope as you did.
Risk tolerance bias – assuming others should take the same risks.
Age bias – assuming capability based on age.
Generational bias – interpreting behaviour through generational stereotypes.
Cultural bias – interpreting behaviour through your cultural lens.
Language bias – misinterpreting communication styles.
Gender bias – assumptions based on gender roles.
Socioeconomic bias – assumptions based on financial background.
Educational status bias – assumptions based on qualifications.
Professional status bias – valuing certain professions more.
Geographic bias – assumptions about people from certain regions.
Social identity bias – judgments based on group identity.
Privilege bias – overlooking systemic barriers others face.
Normative bias – assuming your norms are universal.
Advice bias – wanting to solve the client's problem.
Fixing bias – rushing to solutions rather than exploration.
Expertise bias – relying on professional expertise rather than curiosity.
Model bias – overusing favourite coaching models.
Question bias – asking leading questions that guide outcomes.
Goal bias – pushing for goals before clarity emerges.
Action bias – encouraging action before reflection.
Productivity bias – valuing measurable outcomes over insight.
Outcome bias – judging coaching success purely by results.
Efficiency bias – rushing the coaching process.
Affinity bias – favouring clients similar to you.
Sympathy bias – becoming overly emotionally involved.
Authority bias – assuming senior clients know better.
Status bias – being influenced by a client's position or reputation.
Rescue bias – wanting to help or save the client.
Approval bias – wanting the client to like you.
Conflict avoidance bias – avoiding challenging questions.
Empathy over-identification – projecting your own emotions.
Moral bias – judging clients based on personal values.
Expectation bias – assuming the client will behave in certain ways.
Bias is not something coaches eliminate completely. Instead, professional coaching practice emphasises:
awareness of bias
reflection after sessions
supervision and feedback
maintaining curiosity over assumption
These practices help ensure the client’s thinking remains central to the coaching process.
If you'd like, I can also give you a very useful tool used in coaching supervision called the “Bias Interruption Technique.”
It’s a 5-step method coaches use in real time during sessions to catch bias before it affects the conversation.
5 step method to catch bias in real time
Here is a 5-Step Method to Catch Bias in Real Time During Coaching.
This technique helps coaches maintain neutrality, curiosity, and client-centred presence, which are key principles emphasised in professional coaching frameworks from organisations like the International Coaching Federation, European Mentoring and Coaching Council, and Coaches and Mentors of South Africa.
Bias usually shows up first as an internal signal.
Common signals include:
wanting to give advice
finishing the client’s sentence
feeling certain about the “right answer”
feeling emotionally triggered
rushing toward solutions
Ask yourself internally:
“What reaction am I having right now?”
This moment of awareness creates space between reaction and response.
Instead of immediately responding, slow the conversation down.
Micro-pause techniques:
take a slow breath
relax your shoulders
briefly allow silence
Silence in coaching is powerful.
It prevents the coach from projecting their own interpretation.
Ask yourself a quick internal question:
“What assumption am I making?”
Examples:
“I assume the client wants a promotion.”
“I assume this problem is about confidence.”
“I assume this situation requires more discipline.”
Then ask:
“What else could be true?”
This step reopens curiosity.
Shift the focus back to the client by asking an open exploratory question.
Examples:
“What feels most important to explore here?”
“What does success look like for you in this situation?”
“What options have you considered so far?”
“What meaning does this experience have for you?”
These questions allow the client’s perspective to lead the conversation.
After the coaching session, reflect on the moment.
Questions for reflection:
When did I feel certain about the answer?
What triggered my reaction?
What belief influenced my thinking?
How did I handle the moment?
Many coaches keep a reflection journal to identify recurring patterns.
When bias appears, move through this sequence:
Notice → Pause → Question → Reopen Curiosity → Reflect
This cycle helps maintain coaching presence and neutrality.
Client says:
"I’m thinking about leaving my job."
Coach’s internal bias:
“I left my job and started a business — that changed my life.”
Bias interruption:
1️⃣ Notice → urge to encourage entrepreneurship
2️⃣ Pause → take a breath
3️⃣ Question assumption → maybe the client wants stability
4️⃣ Ask curiosity question →
"What’s leading you to consider that option?"
5️⃣ Reflect later on personal influence
When coaches interrupt bias effectively:
clients feel heard rather than directed
deeper insight emerges
coaching remains client-led
trust in the coaching relationship increases
Key insight:
The best coaches are not those without bias.
They are the ones who recognise bias quickly and return to curiosity.